Suggestions: "Case studies", "Available funding", "Solar power and renewables"

Case Studies

Case Studies

Queensland Beef and Cattle Farms

Energy Savings: 67%   |   Cost Savings: $48,191   |   Capital Cost: $151,103   |   CO2 Savings: 104   |   Project Status: proposed

Industry: Beef
Location: Queensland
Pump Type: Not applicable
Irrigation Type: Not applicable
Technology: Irrigation and Pumps, Lighting, Motors and Fans, Solar Power and Renewables, Batteries and Storage, Variable Speed Drives

The total energy consumption from the measured areas on the 6 farms was 192,783kWh at an annual cost of $51,293, resulting in emissions of 156 tonnes of CO2-e.

Opportunities: the main opportunities identified on the Beef and Cattle farms include

  • Pumping and Irrigation- Savings from Variable Speed Drive installation, pump replacements and maintenance and changes to irrigation design.
  • Heating Ventilation and Cooling (HVAC) Maintenance and upgrades of condenser motor, VSD, ventilation fan and heating.
  • Lighting and General- Replacement and retrofitting of lights with LEDs, infrastructure upgrades to facilitate efficiency gains and general management changes.
  • Solar and BatteriesGrid-connected and standalone.
  • Solar Systems- Ranging in size from 5-100kW.

Table 1. Technology Recommendations and Savings in the Beef and Cattle Industry.

Recommendation

Total Energy Savings (kWh) Cost Savings ($) Capital Cost ($) Average Payback (Years)

Emission Reduction (tCO2-e)

Pumping and Irrigation Upgrades

9 24,597 8,995 24,247 9.05

20

HVAC

2 2,671 544 3,500 13

2

Lighting and General

2 1,245 310 2,400 7.5

1

Solar and Batteries

1 N/A 9,935 27,500 2.7

N/A

Solar Systems

6 100,315 28,707 93,456 3.5

81

Total

20 128,828 48,191 151,103 7.2

104

Total Recommendations

665 7,459,015 2,817,342 12,784,670 6.85

6,042

Table 1 highlights the potential energy savings of 128,828kWh identified in the audits.


beef


Including production benefits, a saving of $48,191 and an estimated 104 tonnes of CO2-e could be realised per annum. At a capital cost of $151,103, the average payback was 7.2 years.

Additional value adding from the energy audits showed how an increase in water delivery, could increase production and profit with a reduction in energy consumed per unit of output.

Table 2. Pre and Post Audit Metrics.

Metric

Pre-Audits Post- Audits

Reduction (%)

Energy Consumption (kWh)

192,783 64,483

67

Energy Costs ($)

51,923 4,293

92

Emissions (tCO2-e)

156 52

67

As the installation of the recommendations is made within the industry, measurement and verification will be undertaken, and case studies will be updated to include the actual energy savings.

beef

Energy Efficiency for your Industry and Business

An energy audit is a great way for a business to cut costs, reduce emissions and boost productivity.

The Energy Savers Plus Extension Program was delivered by the Queensland Farmers' Federation with support and funding from the Queensland Department of Energy and Public Works.

Capture

Back to case studies

Support opportunities for your farm.


A number of initiatives are available for Queensland farms and landholders wishing to find and adopt energy saving initiatives for their farm.

Learn more